The Larson Research Center

The Law of One material mentions and claims validity to DBL physics. I personally am not concerned with the validity of channeled material in general, however the 'metaphysical' concepts emphasized in the books lead me to believe fully in Larsonian physics which may coincide with the electrical model of the universe. I am extremely interested though I am not sure it is fully possible to understand all the complexities of the universe. I believe that empty space is filled with 'fluid' call them strings, I have yet to learn the language. I believe these 'strings' or loops are comparable to cells in a brain. They are super-conductive, able to transfer information as intelligent energy at infinite velocity that translates into perceivable data starting with the photon, condensing into matter as it fractalizes throughout the whole continuum through the illusion of time, carrying with it a general understanding of previous vibratory patterns (reiterration), thus gaining in complexity farther into the continuum as more energy or motion is expressed through the medium. The patterns are further localized down to individualized energy fields. All loops are fully 'activated' when viewed from a balanced, timeless perspective. In this way all possible experience exists in parallel. This is the black hole's perspective, if it were to have one. According to the Law of One this continuum works in a cyclic fashion in which the end goal is unity. I suppose WE are each unique 'loops' in relative postitions in the 'source field' experiencing one fractal vibratory pattern subjectively as THIS universe. When we as self-aware individuals regularize our vibratory patterns with that of infinity we dissolve into nothingness and start a new experience on the largest of scales, retaining our uniqueness. We essentially grow into our limitless body. Black holes are comparable to PURE experience or understanding, energy or the lack thereof, and relate to the 'dimension' or 'octave' above. These are entities that have gained enough experience to reunite with infinity and are no longer radiating light but systematically absorbing it. The empty space (nothingness is the only thing that truly does not exist) is the previous knowledge or experience/dimension or the one below. The entirety of this universes past experience is expressed as its natural laws and are written in the individual 'strings' (comprised originally from thought for lack of a better concept). I believe that one 'loop' is equivalent mathematically to the universe which is itself one 'loop'. They are both of unimaginably opposite sizes and dimensionality. Size begins to become another infinite maze from this understanding. I know this makes no sense because we have no way of associating our bodies to anything besides what we can perceive and measure. We view it backwards I think. We may never be able to say, as humans, that death is an illusion but this is what I have come to believe in. Is there an informative correlation between the concepts that follow: the universe with its fluid-like informative medium that we perceive as nothing/everything, vs DMT (the spirit molecule) over-activating brain activity and allowing for conscious experience to 'seem' to bend around time itself? The imagination of the mind has been potentiated and is 'running rampant' looped inward opon previous experience. One model that may or may not help in understanding this fractal reciprocal model of the universe is a visual feedback loop of three or more projectors fed to one camera. Youtube: 'how to make fractals without a computer' This demonstrates a simple expression of this 'math' creating itself from no processing of information. The paradoxes of infinity seem to generate themselves when math regognizes infinity as a concept and then tries to express it. Math is simply one language in which to express infinite ideas: namely relationships between numbers and the patterns therein. I believe the phenomonon of this illusion has to do with rotational velocity expressed vibrationally as energy (motion) as work of all physical and non-physical natures. Patterns can be noticed in natural geometry.

I appreciate ANY and ALL feedback. Am I crazy? does any of this make at least a little sense to anyone? I remain skeptical yet open minded. Concepts begin to dissolve into infinity when viewed as abstractly as possible. This is neither good nor bad in my opinion, I simply share a limited understanding.

The following is the specific section from session 20 of The Law of One concerning Dewey B. Larson's physical theory and how vibrations may effect the expression of DNA.. Purely for hypothetical interest purposes.

Questioner: Speaking of the rapid change that occurred in the physical vehicle from second to third density: this occurred, you said, in approximately a generation and a half. Body hair was lost and there were structural changes. I am aware of the physics of Dewey B. Larson, who states that all is motion or vibration. Am I correct in assuming that the basic vibration that makes up the physical world changes, thus creating a different set of parameters, shall I say, in this short period of time between density changes allowing for the new type of being? Am I correct?
Ra: I am Ra. This is correct.
Questioner: Is the physics of Dewey Larson correct?
Ra: I am Ra. The physics of sound vibrational complex, Dewey, is a correct system as far as it is able to go. There are those things which are not included in this system. However, those coming after this particular entity, using the basic concepts of vibration and the study of vibrational distortions, will begin to understand that which you know as gravity and those things you consider as “n” dimensions. These things are necessary to be included in a more universal, shall we say, physical theory.
Questioner: Did this entity, Dewey, then bring this material through for use primarily in the fourth density?
Ra: I am Ra. This is correct.
Questioner: Yesterday we were talking about the split that occurs when an entity either consciously or unconsciously chooses the path that leads to either service to others or service to self. The philosophical question of why such a split even exists came up. It was my impression that just as it is in electricity, if we have no polarity in electricity we have no electricity; we have no action. Therefore, I am assuming that it is the same in consciousness. If we have no polarity in consciousness we also have no action or experience. Is this correct?
Ra: I am Ra. This is correct. You may use the general term “work.”

I have also included one of my favorite ideas from the working. This is from the first Session. The question was lost because the questioner was sitting too far from the microphone apparently. All begins and ends in mystery. Spiral out!

Ra: I am Ra. Consider, if you will, that the universe is infinite. This has yet to be proven or disproven, but we can assure you that there is no end to your selves, your understanding, what you would call your journey of seeking, or your perceptions of the creation. That which is infinite cannot be many, for many-ness is a finite concept. To have infinity you must identify or define the infinity as unity; otherwise, the term does not have any referent or meaning. In an infinite Creator there is only unity. You have seen simple examples of unity. You have seen the prism which shows all colors stemming from the sunlight. This is a simplistic example of unity. In truth there is no right or wrong. There is no polarity for all will be, as you would say, reconciled at some point in your dance through the mind/body/spirit complex which you amuse yourself by distorting in various ways at this time. This distortion is not in any case necessary. It is chosen by each of you as an alternative to understanding the complete unity of thought which binds all things. You are not speaking of similar or somewhat like entities or things. You are every thing, every being, every emotion, every event, every situation. You are unity. You are infinity. You are love/light, light/love. You are. This is the Law of One. May we enunciate in more detail?
Questioner: No.

From what I understand... from a 'quantum mechanics' perspective: The closer we look, the more the concept of '0' becomes an illusion. This makes me think that in order for us to begin to make more sense of what is happening here we may need to view it as one concept with seemingly infinite perspectives, vibrations, forces, dimensions, etc...

I just watched some Alan Watts. I love his perspective. I watched 'OM the sound of LOVE' It makes some sense to me.

Yes, it is interesting all right, but unfortunately it's not scientific knowledge, even though it might be true. Scientific knowledge is based on a different epistemology.

You would probably find more understanding of your views at Bruce Peret's website. He is very much involved in the Ra Material and the Law of One. His website is at:

http://rs2theory.org/

May we enunciate in more detail?
Questioner: No.

LOL

If you like the metaphysical check out 'The Urantia Book' and its cosmology. people have been studying it for 50years now and there are interesting blogs on the science it presents. Also, look up Dan Winter and Walter Russell.

Thanks for the suggestion.